Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Trilobite
Joined: Nov 7, 2007
Points: 121
|
|
Re: The HENRY vacuum.
Reply #5 Jan 19, 2008 7:22 pm |
|
I have also used these machines in a industrial environment; or more properly, the commercial version of "Henry". They had twin motors; the older ones were rated at 800 Watts each motor; 1600 Watts combined. They were adequate, but nothing special. The electricians did not care for them, as the motors kept burning out. With reference to the 'consumer test': was that in "The Sun" newspaper, by any chance? If so, I definately would not take that paper's reporting as gospel. What it doesn't know, it tends to manufacture! (Edited for clarification)
This message was modified Jan 19, 2008 by Trilobite
|
Trilobite
Joined: Nov 7, 2007
Points: 121
|
|
Re: The HENRY vacuum.
Reply #7 Jan 19, 2008 8:06 pm |
|
I saw somewhere that there is a "Hetty" version of "Henry": a female version in pink, with eyelashes! (Was it in a link to Littlewoods Catalogue?) Also, there is a special version of the Numatic vacuum cleaner, known as the "Medivac Microfilter". This is all metal construction, and individually tested and certified to HEPA filtration standard. UK consumers can purchase it 'Value Added Tax' free, if suffering from a respiratory allergy. Previously was only a 1000 Watt motor, now a 1200 Watt. There was scientific paper somewhere, dating from the mid nineties about the efficiency of domestic vacuum cleaners, and how as they aged, filtration efficiency became dreadful (plastic-cased machines warped under the hot exhaust air from the motor, allowing unfiltered air to bypass the filters, etc.).
|
|
|