Vacuum Cleaners Discussions

Someone is asking me this but I have no clue. So what would you recommend to someone that has $200.00 to spend on a vacuum cleaner.

Thank you Mole for remembering the lightly used or rebuilt  and ever repairable war horses.  There's a lot of worth in the machines due to their abilty to endure alone.  I hope that more buyers to be this year will consider the same and maybe shake up the industry.  They say money talks.

Best,

Venson

CarmineD wrote:
Found it and what a disappointment. The Hoover looked so cheap and pieces where missing and broken off the vacuum... I'll pass on the Hoover for now...

Acerone wrote:

For $170 to $200, especially in the canisters, you won't find much better from other makes and models.  At those prices, there's nothing special.  In part, the reason Consumers rated it a BEST CANISTER!

If you read my post on the other thread, your opinion epitomizes the point about US consumers looking for quality purchases now when they plunk down their bucks.  There is a pervasiveness among vacuum buyers [like you] who are frustrated and disgusted with the big box store China crap, to follow Mole and Venson's advice and seek out "good used/rebuilt" quality brands.  And you [and buyers like you] are parting ways with the big box retailers for vacuum purchases and will look for alternatives for your vacuum purchases:  The independent vacuum stores. 

Carmine D.

CarmineD wrote:
As someone who has held a constant subscription to CR for the past 9.5 years (Summer of '98, August issue to be exact) and has tracked the ratings during the entire time, I wouldn't take anything CR says to heart, "best" or not.  Their ratings are VERY inconsistent, not only with vacuums although that accounts for a large part of it.  Sometimes I look at the garbage they recommend and ask myself, "What were they thinking?!"  That Hoover WindTunnel canister looks cheap in the pictures, and I bet with that nasty clogging bin filter it will end up spewing dust too.  Gross.  As I've said before, if the filtered bagless was the only bagless type on the market today, I would take a disposable bag machine over one of those 100 times over.   And with the Kirby, she would have to look for something before 1981 if she wanted something that didn't use disposable bags.  I don't care for those cloth shakeout bags either, talk about a thing of the past.  My Sanitaire had one and I just recently converted it over to the F&G disposable bag setup, replacing the outer bag.  Boy, what an improvement that made as far as ease of use goes.

I'm sticking with my first choice, the dual-cyclone TFV, no messy bin filters to clean there.  Longevity is of course a question, but even then it certainly can't be worse than anything else out there in that price range.  The bottom line is that she'd have to spend a little more to get a truly good new machine.

Motorhead wrote:

For a vacuum budget of $170-$200 there's nothing special about the bagless canisters on the market today, which I personally and professionally don't like [for many of the same reasons CR states].  

As Mole and Venson recommended, with a $200 budget for a vacuum price requirement, a rebuilt/slightly used/rebuilt industry stalwart would  fare much better than anything new on the market today for $200.  Again, like the budget constraint, if the bagless feature is not a deal breaker.  I've made the point in several previous recent posts on the Forum that to get a good quality NEW vacuum in today's market, you have to spend more than $200 [and I'm not talking about a big box store dyson] and shop/buy at the vacuum store independents, not the big box retailers.

Carmine D.

Motorhead wrote:

Hello Motorhead:

I assume you are in the vacuum cleaner business and hence the reason you've held a CR subscription for 10 years.  What do you think is a better consumer information guide for vacuums than CR? 

I have never been a staunch CR subscriber and reader.  I have been in and around the vacuum business all my long living life [praise be to God].  I have bought and read selected issues of CR over the past 60 years, primarily for vacuums.  I usually purchase the edition off the magazine rack.  I know many smart, well-educated, well to do people who are CR subscribers.  I have respect and admiration personally and professionally for these persons.

CR has gotten better over the years with its vacuum tests and ratings.  More in line with the consensus of vacuum industry experts and professionals.  However, I still, like you and others in the business, have many disagreements with CR when it comes to vacuums.  Be that as it may, is there, and has there ever been, a better reference guide for vacuum buying consumers on the market than CR? 

One vacuum choice that CR and I are in total agreement on is the HOOVER Tempo for $60.   Always rated in the top 10 by CR year after year.  And there are others too that we agree on.

Carmine D.

Venson wrote:

Hi Venson, You and others on the forum [KNOW WHERE IT'S AT].I dont think anyone on the forum would not want a HOOVER concept1,or 2, for wall to wall superior rug cleaning,even the old stand by decade 80 ,or even the famous hoover 61,62, . Of course you know that i use a silverardo in my own home,it's only 26 years old.Quite frankly Venson the vacuum pro's are really tired of the china JUNK.

As Carmine says [everything becomes a toaster for the sake of the Almighty buck.

MOLE

Hiya Mole,

The best part is that there are disposable bag makers who can supply high filtration bags for some of these older models.  That reduces worry for those fussy about air quality.  I have spotted one dealer on the web, vacrus.com, who sells high-filtration bags (type A) that fit the Concept 1 and Aerus has high quality firlter bags on hand for older Electroluxes prior the Renaissance .

Like they say, there's more than one way to skin a cat.

Best,

Venson

Venson just a quick question for you [or anyone else],who has the vacuum contract with sears now,Is it L.G. or T.T.I. I believe PANASONIC is out of the loop now.

Thanks

 MOLE

CarmineD wrote:
Hi Carmine,

To clear a few things up--like a few posters here, I am not in the vacuum cleaner business, nor have I ever claimed to be...in fact I've said just the opposite before.  However, since I *am* a collector and have both old and new cleaners, as well as having had experience using *many* machines over the years and talking with many who *are* in the business as well, I have a pretty good idea on what a good machine should be.  By no means am I an "expert" on anything (and, again, I have never claimed to be one), but I do give insight/advice/etc. where I see fit.

The reason I have held a steady subscription to CR was at first because I *thought* it was a good guide for consumers.  I used to take their recommendations seriously.  My opinion of that changed early on, within the first 2-3 years of my subscription.  I noticed that the ratings were very inconsistent, and they had recommended machines I had either had, used, or seen "up close" and did not think much of.  For example, the Oreck and Kenmore Progressive, both of which I have had.  The Oreck (XL9100 to be exact), while not the worst machine as far as quality went, wasn't the best performer.  The Kenmore Progressive (one of the first from May '98) was OK, but its main flaw was the belt lifter which had the annoying habit of popping back up from the bare floor setting, due to the tension of the belt and a weak lock.  I knew that a few years after that they had eliminated the belt lifter with the 2-motor "Direct Drive" design, which somewhat justified the recommendation, but even then I didn't think it was the best (not good enough to be top rated or close behind). 

So now we come to the most recent vacuum report in the Oct. 07 issue.  Take for example the (filtered) bagless Kenmore Progressive and Hoover Windtunnel 2, rated at #3 and #4 respectively.  An "average buyer" would think that is normal, but any of us would take a second look because they are filtered bagless machines!  Machines that would no doubt clog after picking up a certain amount of test dirt (not to mention extremely messy to empty).  Yet other decent machines such as the Sebo, Riccar, and (dare I say it) Dyson DC17 rank below them!  What gives here?  And, 2 more classic "only in CR" moments occur when the Bissell HealthyHome (which is still a good cleaner and near-perfect duplicate of the Dyson) scores one above the Dyson DC17, and the Riccar SupraLite beats the 2-motor Radiance.  In the canisters category, the horrid Electrolux Oxygen ranks ABOVE the Sebo Air Belt, another one which I have used and is a fantastic machine that is very well built.  The power nozzle is literally self-propelled, it's that aggressive.  And, speaking of Electrolux, the Electrolux TwinClean, which (at least from outside appearance) uses a seemingly identical power nozzle to the Oxygen, failed the pet hair test.  CR's comment: "Our tough pet-hair test stopped it [the power nozzle] cold."  Am I to believe that two identical power nozzles earned completely different ratings on the same test?  I don't think so.  And what about that Koblenz upright which is a slightly (cosmetically) modified Sanitaire SC899, that we all know is a tried-and-true design?  It's ranked second to last.   Again, what happened?  CR's main complaint on that one is the F&G bag and how it's difficult to install.  It isn't the easiest to attach, but I've never ripped the paper fill tube on one of those, like CR claimed they did. 

One thing you will also notice, is that if you pay attention to the color-coded ratings, you'll see how they sometimes don't correspond with the overall score and ranking.  Something can receive two "good" scores in two categories, with the rest being either "very good" or "excellent", yet you have something with two "fair" scores ranking above that.  For example, how does the Dyson DC18 Slim, a new machine with one "fair" score for noise, rank below the DC07 or Hoover Savvy with 3 "fairs" each? 

What I'm pointing out are just a few of many discrepancies in the ratings.  Otherwise similar machines are ranked completely opposite of one another, and much more.  As I said, it's not just vacuums either.

CR is far from the best reference guide out there.  However, it's the most well-known, so to a certain extent it's the only one.  I'm not aware of any other consumer guides out there now, but if they do exist, they would be much too obscure for the average consumer to even give them a second look.

-MH