Vacuum Cleaners Discussions |
|
Severus
If my vacuum can remove even one spec of dirt that yours misses, then mine is better than yours - even if there's no proof that mine would have picked up as much dirt as yours...
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Points: 397
![]()
|
 |
Re: the new Consumer Reports ratings are out
Reply #5 Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm |
|
Hi Severus, If 100 percent is top score, the three cleaners in mention may rate as slightly less than average in the bigger picture but "good" is good. I have checked out operator manuals on these and would make mention of some points you may not have considered. The Panasonic MC-V5241, albeit marvelously simplistic -- plain old flat belt and all, is old news in the sense that it is still the same deal that the company's offered since many years ago. The "automatic height adjustment" means merely that the cleaning head pivots on the main body of the unit. Thus, when or when not may ease of pushing be a problem. Also, if suggested retail price is actually $400.00, it is a bit of an insult to buyers that a set of attrachments, whether on-board or separate are not included. There is an attachment set for this machine offered as an option but there are other upriights that clean as well or better, have more features and an impressive sets of attachments for less money. There is nothing here to merit this cleaner a higher ranking. From what I saw in the manual there are no additional rollers on the base plate nor a brush strip or plastic "wiper" for bare floor cleaning. Despite CRs estimate of its bare floor cleaning ability, I would be a bit skeptical about its actual performance in that area especially in situations where grit like sand might be encountered. Even more concern should be due if we're talking good wood flooring. The Miele left me surprised by the miserly attachment set-up onboard. The mechanism for stopping the brushroll action is at the base of the cleaner meaning to employ it you must stoop to reach it each time you move off carpeting to hard flooring OR want to use the hose . This is very inconvenient. Here also I gained no awareness that anything special had been done regarding bare floor cleaning. This is also another flat belt user I believe. There's not much going on here either and think this machine is pegged just about right. Last but not least, pricey and also attachmentless Oreck offers little versatility to lend to enthusiasm about its purchase. I make note , per the manual, that belt changes should be made every six months. A lot of needless bother in a time when cogged and "V" belts are so common. As for capet cleaning scores that CR rendered -- take them with a grain of salt. There could be any number of design reasons -- like woosy brush rolls -- that lessen their potential. However, in a home where housekeeping duties are frequently and regularly observed any of these three may serve the purpose just as well as higher ranked machines. In abodes where cleaning is done catch-as-catch-can, probably a better performing and better fitted out machine is required. Best, Venson Venson, My point is that even though these three vacuums have very similar scores on the individual tests, the overall scores and rankings vary wildly. I believe the Miele is actually built by Panasonic. It has a notched beater bar on the brush roll. I agree the Panasonic is a bare bones model, but there are people who only use a vacuum for cleaning carpeting. As you noted, you can purchase a hose and set of tools for this vacuum. Panasonic offers more deluxe models, but ultimately CR picked this bare bones model. I believe one could purchase this Panasonic online for about $200 about a year ago, so the $400 price tag does seem a little high. If you have a lot of wood floors, I suspect you would be better off purchasing a canister vacuum rather than an upright. One caveat for the cleaning bare floors score - CR does not use the optional bare floor tools that come with many premium vacs. It uses the carpet cleaning nozzle. So when Rainbow gets a lousy score for cleaning bare floors, the test is done with the power nozzle rather than the bare floor tool. On the plus side, I am happy to see that CR is testing a greater variety of vacuums. I'm just not sure whether the results are relevant.
The smart tyrant writes his own story to ensure that it is favorable. The lazy will repeat lines from the book without fact checking.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
![]()
|
 |
Re: the new Consumer Reports ratings are out
Reply #6 Dec 31, 2007 5:09 pm |
|
The biggest surprise to me was the mediocre score for carpet cleaning for the Panasonic Performance Plus Platinum.
CR is coming down pretty hard on dyson models for pet hair pick up. For example, the DC15 gets a "poor" rating for removing pet hair from carpeting. Not what one would expect/anticipate from a vacuum priced at $500. Although I see them (DC15's) kicked around now for much much less. I recall that the original MSRP for this DC15 was $600 before the $100 price drop (after 3 months of launch).
My sense is that the recent price reductions are due in part to the poor CR ratings for the DC15, which ranks a paltry 20 out of 43. Carmine D.
This message was modified Dec 31, 2007 by CarmineD
|
Venson
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Points: 1900
![]()
|
|
|
Re: the new Consumer Reports ratings are out
Reply #7 Jan 1, 2008 1:03 pm |
|
Hi all, Well . . . we're here. It's officially 2008. Following is a link to a video from Consumer Reports that may prove enlightening to some as to CRs testing methods and general opinion. Though you may view the video you cannot move to the actual online reports unless you are a subscriber. Here's the link -- http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/resources/images/video/Vacuum%20Video%20Final/Vacuums525.html Happy New Year, Venson |
mole
.
Location: earth
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Points: 783
![]()
|
|
|
Re: the new Consumer Reports ratings are out
Reply #8 Jan 2, 2008 8:39 am |
|
CR is coming down pretty hard on dyson models for pet hair pick up. For example, the DC15 gets a "poor" rating for removing pet hair from carpeting. Not what one would expect/anticipate from a vacuum priced at $500. Although I see them (DC15's) kicked around now for much much less. I recall that the original MSRP for this DC15 was $600 before the $100 price drop (after 3 months of launch). My sense is that the recent price reductions are due in part to the poor CR ratings for the DC15, which ranks a paltry 20 out of 43. Carmine D.
Hi Carmine,Venson, all i can say is thank GOD that the DYSON parts availability has finally come to the smart indy's, There is more doe,ray,me, in the service parts than the actual sale of the machine.Of course you guys knew that all along.
MOLE/O.T.
|
CarmineD
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Points: 5894
![]()
|
|
|
Re: the new Consumer Reports ratings are out
Reply #9 Jan 2, 2008 8:54 am |
|
Hi Carmine,Venson, all i can say is thank GOD that the DYSON parts availability has finally come to the smart indy's, There is more doe,ray,me, in the service parts than the actual sale of the machine.Of course you guys knew that all along. MOLE/O.T.
HAPPY NEW YEAR MOLE-OLD-TIMER:
Yes to your concluding statement. I know many vacuum store owners/operators, here and on the east coast (where I came from), who carry the dyson line, not particurlarly because they like it but for business reasons: To accomodate their current and future customers/clientele. Glad to hear you are too. Of course, this is true of other vacuum brands. With one major difference for dyson. Because of its high product prices and big box stores' availability, the aftermarket business for dyson repairs and parts should be exceptionally profitable for independent vacuum stores (who jump on the dyson bandwagon). But there is a big IF: New dyson product prices stay high. Carmine D.
This message was modified Jan 2, 2008 by CarmineD
|
|
|
