Maybe the hydro drive and electromagnetic clutch reduce the power needs of this machine and put more power where its needed more efficiently?? Thanks JAMIE
For me, I don't think hydrostatic drive is more efficient than friction disc drive. If anything, I think hydro robs more power from the engine. The electro magnetic clutch isn't more efficient than the belt clutch. Hydrostatic and the electromagnetic clutch are convenience technology. Hydro allows for easy infinite speed adjustment, and well suited for tracked snowblowers (CVT variable ratio pulleys versus geared transmission). The clutch for dealing with occasional impact without needing conventional shear pins. (think circuit breakers versus a fuse)
The efficiency comes from the details in the rotational friction, inertia, auger, impeller, impeller housing, and the discharge chute. There's a little bit of black magic that is in the realm of Bernoulli's principle pertaining to pump design. Water acts funny depends on the phase it is in.