Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

Looking at the Honda website I see the Honda HS520 (US version) throws a outstanding 55 tons/hr. The Canadian version can only handle 32 tons/hr. Does Honda actually expect someone to believe that the US version has a higher output than the 928? Is this a joke or am I missing something?

trouts2 wrote:
Possibly, but a fresh operator may have to be relayed every 20 minutes.  It gets pretty tiring to manhandle that beast for extended amount of time.

trouts2 wrote:
I know you were just using specs. as a starting point.  There are so many variables that quoting any type of tons per hour figures is almost useless info. as you know.
Cubic volume per hour would actually be a more useful figure.   But again how would a person quantify that. 

You made me stop and think.  My bucket is 32"  works out to 3.4 miles. clearing a football field.  That is a long walk at any speed.  I'd probably have to build a sulky
for my blower.

Still quite a long walk, a very slow one at that.  I'd probably farm it out to a plow service.

>>>Possibly, but a fresh operator may have to be relayed every 20 minutes.  It gets pretty tiring to manhandle that beast for extended amount of time.

 

   At least mine is cake to walk behind on a smooth surface.  Out on the road or sidewalk it’s fine.  The driveway is moguls and the thing is a bear to deal with, not so much fun, and a pain to use.

 

>>>Cubic volume.

 

    That would eliminate a calc step but cu ft/per or tons are both not so readily understandable. 

 

>>>I'd probably have to build a sulky for my blower.

  

    Keep in mind the first calc was for the 824 at 1.25 hours.  Just guessing from that the Honda would probably be in the 1.5 to 2 hour range.

 

   Given the time pickle for the 824 to cover a lot of ground to capture 55 tons in 1 hour some quantity in the calc would have to be modified to bring the 55 tons into the marketing claim. 

   One possibility is using bigger tires to get the ground speed which a marketing guy would not think much about but it’s unrealistic. 

 

    Bumping the density of snow is the most realistic.  Using a snow density of 6lb per cu/ft would speed things up considerably.  NOA says very wet snow is 21lbs per so 6lbs might be more reasonable.

   However unlikely the marketing number seems to be the bigger "deliar" is the Honda number vs Toro which is about half of the Toro claim. 

 

Re-calc at 18 inches of 6lb snow:

 

300 x 160 x 1.5 (18 inches) = 7200 cu/ft

7200 x 6lb = 432000 / 2000 =  216 ton

 

Given that the original estimate was 57 ton for a Toro 28 inch bucket a 24 would 7/8^th of that so reducing 57 tons for the 24 inch bucket would be about 50 ton.

 

50 tons of 18 inch 6lb snow on a football field would be about take up a quarter of a football field.

 

A football field is 160 feet wide so ¼ is 40 x 300.  For a 24 inch bucket that would be 20 300 foot passes or 6000 feet which is over a mile (5280) by 720 feet.  That would take 1.14 pmh to cover the 6000 feet in a hour. 

 

An Ariens machine would have to set gear one slightly higher or gear two lower.   It would be tough going for 18 inch snow but if sticking snow effects were reduced by being super cold it could have a shot at clearing that fast.  That’s a factor I did not think about before, the effects temp.  The marketing guys probably test on super cold days.