Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

I purchased my lawnmower  May 12 , 1998 , so it is about 13 years old. It is a Craftsman 944.368300  s/n 010 998m 000270 It is powered by a Tecumseh VLV066  6.75 horsepower engine             No, I am not taking any pictures of the old thing.

21 inch cut,  , front wheel drive, has no throttle. starts wide open. I have had no problems with this mower  except maintenance required replacing the (always spinning ) front wheels twice. They are around $60  each at Sears , but I got  2 for $12    on e-bay ,twice. I have changed the oil every year, use the Craftsman 30 oil. and have changed the sparkplug  a few times.

I have been looking at some the new offerings and would like to  have an opinion on front or rear wheel drive. I've never used a rwd .

I looked at a Troy built at Can Tire yesterday.  It is rwd , has large rear  wheels, a Honda 160 cc engine,  Electric start with a battery on board, all 4 wheels can be adjusted for cutting height with  one control lever.   I think it is 21 inch , has left and right control levers to adjust ground speed.     It is priced at $599.99    I will get them  to move it down from the rack , the next time that I am in the store, so I can get a better look at it.     Sears are just getting in their new models  so will look at them soon.

Thanks for that information,   I will check with kijiji  and start looking for a used model.

Borat,

I've been watching for a older Lawnboy 2 stroke mower.  I've read that certain engines can be finicky running right without surging.  I'm not too familiar with carburetor and jet settings.  What should I be looking for when looking at those Lawnboys?

I'm currently using a Toro Super Recycler, a very good mulching mower.  However, it is pathetic at bagging, even when equipped with a "bagging" blade.  The blade has minimal lift.  The deck is optimized for mulching so I'm not going to attempt to make a good bagging mower out of it.

I normally mulch, but occasionally would like to bag.  So I'm looking for a second mower and wonder if the Lawnboy is good at bagging.

The other mower I've been considering is the Snapper Hi-Vac.  It's built like a tank, so to speak, and bags really well.  And because its like a tank, it's too heavy for trimming.  I have a lot of curved landscape, lots of turns, so lightweight and maneuverability is paramount.

I really can't tell you much about Lawn Boy bagging ability.  I owned one a while back with a bag attachment but never used it.  It was the mower that my neighbour left down at the curb for garbage which I brought back to life and gave away to my old neighbour at camp.   He never used the bagger either.   It didn't look too effective and the bag hung out to the side and rear of the mower.  Clumsy looking to say the least.    

As far as the carburetor issues, that's pretty much with the more modern LB  and Toro mowers as well as some of the R-tek engines  used by Toro.  The old LB machines (I'm guessing) but say from the mid 80s and earlier didn't have the lean condition carb problems that I'm aware of.  It's the lean condition that causes the surging.  Too small of a pilot jet.  The old style LB engines are fantastic.  I pulled the one I got last year apart to inspect it and was very impressed with it, for a 1973 mower.   Electronic ignition and reed valves if you can imagine!!!  That was leading edge technology back then.   And to top it off, it's self propelled!   By the visual appearance of the mower, I'm sure it has a great deal of time on it.   Nonetheless,  the engine had factory spec compression, starts well and runs strong.  Incredible for it's age.

 If you do some searching, you'll find quite a bit of info on the carburetor surging issue.    

I use the LB to trim the tight spots and generally use a riding mower to cut the open areas.    If I want to bag the grass, I do the trimming first then pick up the clippings with the rider.  However, I never bag anymore.  I mulch everything. 

I'd be willing to bet that if you had LB with  a well swept blade, it would create sufficient lift for bagging.  Maybe there are others who can give you more info on that. 

I will say this, that old LB that I bought last year is a delight to use compared to the heavy Echo.  The echo weighs close to 80 lbs.  I bet the LB is around 30 lbs.   Much easier to pull back and drag around. 

borat wrote:
What are the advantages of rear wheel drive on a lawn mower

The bag is usually on the rear of the mower.  The weight of the grass in the bag enhances traction of the rear wheels where it would reduce traction on front wheel drives.

By the way, here's a link for two beautiful Lawn Boy mowers in  Shediac New Brunswick.   The one on the right look like the one I have but without self propulsion.   For $50.00 each, I'd scoop them both up!!


http://newbrunswick.kijiji.ca/c-buy-and-sell-tools-equipment-lawn-mower-for-sale-W0QQAdIdZ270474203

I have a feeling "royster" has a sophisticated taste and may not like those suggested by borat (who loves to collect vintage OPEs).  But by looking at royster's taste for a fine snowblower, he just may go for a hydrostatic lawnmower. I like buying new OPEs since I enjoy becoming intimate with them.  May I suggest a red hydrostatic lawnmower to match your red snowblower. 

MN_Runner wrote:
Call them vintage if you like.  Regardless, they're still among the best lawn mowers made.   I have another relatively modern self propelled mower that I have retired since acquiring the old Lawn Boy.   Don't be fooled by the appearance.  A little cleaning and a fresh coat of green paint will appease the cosmetically inclined.   Thereafter, the proud owner will have one fine mower! 

MN_Runner wrote:

Thanks,   It would be  best that I do not use the " h" word for a while ! ! !

Some of the best mowers that i know of are the vintage ones from the 1980's.  They were cast aluminum or magnesium decks with solid mechanical.  The Honda Master HR14 and the John Deere 14SB, 14PZ were my favorites.  The engines were very tolerant of abuse and not as sensitive to bad fuel as today's "Made for California" machines.  I like that they were lightweight, compact, felt solid, and very maneuverable.  My old time favorite was the Deere 14PZ mower, simple push mower with very little to break.  It was fairly light so self propelled was not necessary.  In fact, I prefer non self propelled mower for trimming.

I haven't used Lawnboy 2 stroke mowers, but there's a lot of good things said about them.  Vintage or not, good solid design is timeless.  Too bad Lawnboy name of recent has eroded due to corporate take overs and EPA pressures.  Although I like Toro products overall, I don't much care for the Toro clones Lawnboy machines.  They were supposed to the Toro's premiere line but that didn't last.

If a person is an OPE fanatic, it's more appealing to pick up a vintage mower and bring it back to life than to buy the disposable paper thin stamped deck variety of modern budget mowers, they're functional machines without soul.  Because of this, its very easy for owners to ditch them when they start behaving badly.

royster wrote:
Amen.