Abby's Guide to Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more)
Username Password
Discussions Reviews More Guides
Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes

Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions

Search For:
trouts2




Location: Marlboro MA
Joined: Dec 8, 2007
Points: 1328

The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Original Message   Oct 8, 2010 10:53 am

Some comments on gearboxes:

 

The new MTDs seems to be the same gearbox they have used for many years.  Not so thick aluminum with a small brass gear.  For most models 5hp up to 13 on the standard models I’ve seen they use the same components.  I have not seen them but people have mentioned MTD pro or commercial models with a CI gearboxes.  They are probably ok.

 

Ariens has a few versions of aluminum gearbox.  The basic gearbox seems to be essentially the same they have used for many years.  The newer implementations use a gear which is approximately the same size as the MTD gear.  Prior to using that gear they had a similar size gear that had a side section about ¼ inch which would add rigidity.  That side section held the gear shear pin.  Pre-Briggs 5-7hp Simplicity machines used the same style of gear.   The old Ariens and Simplicity seemed to be a better gear than MTD and Ariens currently use.

 

Ariens has introduced the XS aluminum gearbox which is much bigger than their basic gearbox and seems to be thick aluminum.   I have not seen one of the gears yet but would think it’s bigger than in their basic aluminum gearbox.   The Toro gearbox seems to be about the same as an XS gearbox, i.e. aluminum size and rigidity.  The gears, given the case size, are probably close in size.

 

Ariens CI gearbox uses the same gear as in the XS gearbox so what is the advantage?  From what I’ve heard and read over time cast gearboxes are not better for long term wear.  Their advantage is breakage.  The cast gearbox can take a bigger hit say from something wedging the augers just right to not shear the pins and transfer all the force to the gearbox. 

 

That would make an XS gearbox as good for long term wear as a CI gearbox.  The case gearbox’s value is reducing catastrophic failure.  Given that total failure is rare a CI gearbox is not so much of an advantage.   

 

Most of the time when something gets tangled in the augers you know and can stop before things go too far.  For bigger problems the machine stalls and there is no damage.  For still bigger problems the pin shears.  Past that is gearbox damage.   

 

All in all it’s a rare thing for something to damage a gearbox.  If you walk around your area a few times before the snow season a few times to pickup stones and branches you greatly reduce chances for a problem.  If you remember you have a door mat, toys in the yard and paper delivery you won’t suck them in.  

 

Overall there is not much advantage to a cast gearbox for the average person.  It’s not like 20% Russian Roulette.  Given a slight amount of preseason prep a homeowner will probably never scoop in something that will nuke a gearbox.  In commercial service where the machine would clear places they the operator is not familiar the chances are higher of scooping in something that will be a problem.  Also say for a company that has a machine for lot clearing.  The employee will be using a company machine and not so careful so a CI would be useful here also.

 

For wear differences:

MTD and Murray are on the low end.  Their design has been the same for years.  Given that the same gearbox is designed and used on their big machines and works that gearbox in 5 through 10 should be plenty strong for those machines.  Outside of a failure and with proper use and even minimal maintenance those gearboxes will easily last for 20 years.  I’ve never seen a worn MTD gearbox, only broken gearboxes. 

 

Toro and Ariens aluminum gearboxes are big and strong gearboxes and should outperform MTD and Murray but the difference or advantage is in long term wear >20 years and ability to sustain a bigger gearbox hit.  Seeing that the lesser gearboxes and last for 20 years a stronger gearbox is of questionable advantage.

 

The unknown:

What is the quality of the gear and worm?  Over the years I’ve never seen a detail spec of these components.   MTD and current Ariens low end aluminum gearboxes have about the same gear.  What are they both made of?   What are the drive worms made of?  Drive worms seem to be some sort of steel and never the problem in wear.  The gears wear out faster.   On catastrophic failures gears break, teeth chip or smear but the worms usually survive.  Worms sometimes deform but can be brought back with filing and used again. 

 

The upshot is gearboxes are not so important in 10hp and below machines for the average person.  An aluminum gearbox would be fine.   As a qualifier Yamaha use aluminum. 

Replies: 1 - 10 of 16NextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #1   Oct 8, 2010 11:21 am
Trouts,

Thanks for useful information.  I personally feel that aluminum gearboxes are fine for the average homeowner with responsible use of the snowblower.  Every component can be made super tough, which adds costs, weight, and potentially reduce performance.  However, a component that is designed to operate within the safety margin of its intent is the most cost effective and has the highest performance.  Weight and heft is a poor indicator of reliability. 
This message was modified Oct 8, 2010 by aa335
DavidNJ


Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Points: 206

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #2   Oct 8, 2010 11:32 am
Aluminum should also be more corrosion resistant.

However, wouldn't the cast iron gear box also contribute to vehicle weight helping it to keep the nose down in the snow? The Yamaha is a tracked blower where that isn't an issue.

trouts2




Location: Marlboro MA
Joined: Dec 8, 2007
Points: 1328

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #3   Oct 8, 2010 12:10 pm

The influence of the difference in weight between a cast and aluminium gearbox is unimportant.  Just who’s gearboxes anyway?  The smaller Ariens aluminum isn’t available on big scoops.  The different of an XS to a cast is small so not a factor.  For the forces involved the contribution is insignificant.   

 

Yamaha has wheeled models identical to the tracks. 

DavidNJ


Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Points: 206

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #4   Oct 8, 2010 12:45 pm
trouts2 wrote:

The influence of the difference in weight between a cast and aluminium gearbox is unimportant.  Just who’s gearboxes anyway?  The smaller Ariens aluminum isn’t available on big scoops.  The different of an XS to a cast is small so not a factor.  For the forces involved the contribution is insignificant.   

 

Yamaha has wheeled models identical to the tracks. 



Yamaha lists three units on their Canadian site, all tracked. The Japanese site adds a fourth, small no wheeled machine. They don't sell them in the US.

The weight is important because it adds mass to the snowblower, as alternative to adding weights. The other difference may be stiffness. The cast iron and aluminum are about the same cross sectional thickness, or the cast iron is thicker. It should have a modulus of elasticity nearly 3x higher than aluminum. The stiffness is probably irrelevant.

trouts2




Location: Marlboro MA
Joined: Dec 8, 2007
Points: 1328

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #5   Oct 8, 2010 4:22 pm
Yamaha lists three units on their Canadian site, all tracked. The Japanese site adds a fourth, small no wheeled machine. They don't sell them in the US.

And they don't sell them in Africa.  Are you saying I did not have a wheeled Yamaha here last week?

The weight is important because it adds mass to the snowblower, as alternative to adding weights. The other difference may be stiffness. The cast iron and aluminum are about the same cross sectional thickness, or the cast iron is thicker. It should have a modulus of elasticity nearly 3x higher than aluminum. The stiffness is probably irrelevant.

The added weight is about as useful as sticking some bubble gum on the front of the intake housing.  Waiting for the barometric pressure to be right before you clear snow woud give you an advantage but not be so useful.   

aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #6   Oct 8, 2010 5:20 pm
New Yamahas are available for sale in the US?   Where?  What models?  How much?
This message was modified Oct 8, 2010 by aa335
DavidNJ


Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Points: 206

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #7   Oct 8, 2010 6:34 pm
Yamaha may have made wheeled snowblowers, but they don't list any now.

How much more does the cast iron one way compared to aluminum one? Toro, Ariens, etc. sell accessory weights that go over the scoop. Just to counterbalance a cab? 10# 2 1/2 feet in front of the rear wheels is 25ft-lb of torque holding the nose down

aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #8   Oct 8, 2010 7:01 pm
10 pound on the bucket is 10 pound on the bucket, no torque, zero foot-pound, nada, zilch. The perceived weight of that 10 pound maybe more or less at the handle bars, depending on the leverage.
This message was modified Oct 8, 2010 by aa335
DavidNJ


Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Points: 206

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #9   Oct 8, 2010 7:52 pm
aa335 wrote:
10 pound on the bucket is 10 pound on the bucket, no torque, zero foot-pound, nada, zilch. The perceived weight of that 10 pound maybe more or less at the handle bars, depending on the leverage.



10 pounds 2 1/2 ft from the axle is 25 ft-lb holding the nose down. Has anyone tried wheelie bars?

This message was modified Oct 8, 2010 by DavidNJ
aa335


Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434

Re: The value of cast versus aluminum gearboxes
Reply #10   Oct 8, 2010 8:08 pm
You lost me there. :)

What's the purpose of the weight kit? To keep the bucket down when riding over hard pack or to prevent wheelie popping when you engage the drive lever?
This message was modified Oct 8, 2010 by aa335
Replies: 1 - 10 of 16NextNext page of topicsAllView as Outline
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Guide   •   Discussions  Reviews  
AbbysGuide.com   About Us   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Contact Us
Copyright 1998-2024 AbbysGuide.com. All rights reserved.
Site by Take 42