Abby’s Guide > Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) > Discussions > toro 2450 vs toro 221 vs toro 421
Outdoor Power Equipment (Lawn Mowers, Snow Blowers, Chain Saws and more) Discussions |
|
aa335
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Points: 2434
|
|
Re: toro 2450 vs toro 221 vs toro 421
Reply #1 Sep 26, 2009 10:47 pm |
|
The power propel system is already on the 2450. The Power Curve auger looks the same as the 221/421. Maybe the 221/421 is more highlighted "Power Propel" redundancy is used by Marketing folks to justify the higher price. If you are considering the 421 at $880, I would recommend checking out the Honda HS520, also a 4 stroke engine, at the similar price point. The Toro 2450 GTS is a good buy if price is a major consideration. The 2450 is compact and lighter to maneuver. The 221/421 is round and heavier to accomodate both a 2-stroke and larger a 4-stroke engine size. It is priced higher with convenience features such the Quick Chute and Zip Deflector, nice to have in the long run, even the initial higher price difference compared to the 2450 is shocking.
This message was modified Sep 26, 2009 by aa335
|
joed
Joined: Sep 1, 2008
Points: 84
|
|
Re: toro 2450 vs toro 221 vs toro 421
Reply #3 Sep 28, 2009 9:51 pm |
|
The 221 and 2450 are equal in terms of their ability to move snow. The engine is the same - the 221 is just a newer chassis with some neat features (better chute control) and the ability to accommodate a larger, heavier, weaker 4 stroke motor. Weaker? Yes. The R*Tek in the 221 and 2450 will out-throw the tecumseh (and the 4 stroke honda single stage) all day long. Talk to the lawn boy guys and the landscapers who run them (the R*Tek is a piston-ported version of the Lawn Boy Duraforce motor) - they reserve the Duraforces for the longest, wettest, thickest, meanest grass that stalls out all the other 21 inch commercial mowers (honda/briggs/kawasaki powered). That 4 stroke wont seem so appealing when you have to take the snowblower apart to change the oil every year. The reason the 421 is rated at 1800lbs/minute vs 1700lbs/minute is marketing, pure and simple. If you go back a few years and look at the CCR3650 (basically a 2450 with better chute control) you'll see that it is (under)rated at 1800 lbs/minute. They claim a HP difference between the 2450 and the 3650 but this is untrue - disassembly of the units show the exact same motor with the exact same carburetor and exhaust configuration - and this carries on up to the 210/221 as well. So....if the 3650 with the same motor as the 221 and 2450 was rated at 1800lbs/minute, why the change? ;-) Here's some pics of my units as well as some disassembly pics to show I'm not making things up :-) Disassembled 2450 to check the exhaust and carb 2450 and 221 side by side 2 Duraforce (R*Tek Lawn Boys) Thanks for the response superbuick. It's very informative and educational. I notice, from the photos, that you have the 2450 and 221. What differences do you notice between the two models. Does that pivoting scraper on the 221 really take the pushing out of using the snowblower like Toro claims?
|
|
|